Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's general score of 80.3. Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but they are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and better 120 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.