Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a score of 87.5 against 80.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but it is a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% bigger battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.