Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2019-01-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a score of 90.7 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although the Galaxy A52 has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.