Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a 97.6 score against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is a lot heavier but thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and both of them were released with only 8 months difference. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a slightly better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold has a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, faster video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.