Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2019-01-15 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera and better 120 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S7 Active and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 both feature similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.