Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's general score of 80.3. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro have very similar displays, both of them have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a display with the same size and the same screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, faster 120 frames per second video frame rates and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.