Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with an 88.5 score against 80.3. The Galaxy Z Flip body is newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.