Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's general score of 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's, but it's notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and faster 120 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.