Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a 90.6 score against 80.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and notably thinner, but a lot heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.