Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is just a bit thinner but heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and both were released only a couple of months apart.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a quite better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a bit greater screen density, a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a greater memory for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a 1% lower battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.