Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a score of 88.1 against 75.6. Even though the Apple iPhone X is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. Apple iPhone X counts with a superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. Apple iPhone X has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way more MP back camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.