Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 global score. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Apple iPhone XR features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a little smaller display, a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit less pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. IPhone XR counts with a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 36% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.