Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a score of 84.2 against 75.6. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone XS is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Apple iPhone XS features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Apple iPhone XS has a quite better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a better memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.