Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's score of 75.6. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Nexus 6 body is a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it is somewhat thicker and was released 5 years before.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Google Nexus 6 has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with improved battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 24 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.