Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a general score of 80.2 against 75.6. The Google Pixel construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it's notably lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel quantity per inch of display. The Google Pixel counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a back camera with much more MP and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.