Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-26 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a overall score of 76.7 against 75.6. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is a lot lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the previous 15 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller screen.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a superior camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has worse video frame rate, they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.