Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a general score of 82.5 against 75.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it is a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has 1 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a much more mega pixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Google Pixel 2 XL features more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.