Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Although the Google Pixel 3 is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's body is incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.