Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a general score of 81.9 against 75.6. The Google Pixel 4 design is just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even when they were released with only 1 months difference. Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.