Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released 1 months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.