Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 82.9 score against 75.6. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer, a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.