Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a global score of 87.5 against 75.6. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is newer, just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and a much more MP back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.