Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it's also much lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Google Pixel 5 has a better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4080mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.