Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. The HTC U Ultra body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even though it was released many years before. HTC U Ultra has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. HTC U Ultra features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.