Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 77.6 score against 75.6. HTC U11's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even though it was released 2 years before. The HTC U11 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC U11 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The HTC U11 features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 128 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.