Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. LG Velvet's construction is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even though both were released only 8 months apart. LG Velvet and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T both have incredibly similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit larger display.
LG Velvet has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG Velvet and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T have extremely similar cameras, both of them have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size back camera sensor. The LG Velvet counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.