Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having an 89.6 score against 75.6. Even though the Motorola edge and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola edge design is just a bit lighter but a bit thicker. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola edge counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola edge counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola edge features much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.