Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a little lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but both are 0.34inches thick.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a higher resolution camera, a way larger sensor and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.