Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 86.3 score against 75.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with more MP, a much larger aperture to capture better low light captures and a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.