Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it's just a little bit lighter.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite worse pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with a higher resolution, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments, faster video frame rate and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.