Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Smoke black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 76.1 score against 75.6. The Motorola Moto G Power body is thicker but just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and both were released with only a few months difference. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Power has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Moto G Power counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Power's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although the Moto G Power has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
The Moto G Power has longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.