Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-26 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 75.6. The Motorola Moto Z Force is an much older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cores (but slower). The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number per inch of display.
The Moto Z Force has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a back camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.