Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Even though Motorola One Action and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only a few months difference, the Motorola One Action body is lighter but just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Motorola One Action features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch. The Motorola One Action features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Action also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a way higher resolution camera. The Motorola One Action counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.