Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a 79.8 score against 75.6. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper body has the same weight than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it is just a little bit thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T both count with really similar processing units, and although the Motorola One Hyper has 1 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola One Hyper has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, it also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Motorola One Hyper features a battery duration that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.