Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 409 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also a lot thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the older 15 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a camera with more mega pixels and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.