Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a general score of 79.7 against 75.6. Even when the OPPO Find X2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released with a couple of months difference, the OPPO Find X2 is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has more pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a bit bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 features just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.