Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a global score of 83.1 against 75.6. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it must be noted that it is also a a bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a better pixels quantity in each display inch and a bit larger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 7% more battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor, a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.