Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a general score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's design has the same weight than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it's just a little bit thinner.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A16 5G features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A16 5G features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a greater camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with improved battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.