Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a much newer phone, and it is also just a little thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.