Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it is just a bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a camera that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T one, and although the Galaxy A35 5G has a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and a higher resolution back camera, they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G features improved battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.