Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 has an overall score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's global score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A41 is a a lot lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although both were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A41 has a processor that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T one, and although the Galaxy A41 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A41 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.