Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's score of 75.6. Galaxy A50s is a thinner and lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although they were released only 1 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Galaxy A50s count with really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50s has a little worse pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A50s's battery lifetime is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's battery life.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, they both have the same resolution camera, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.