Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 85.5 score against 75.6. Even when the Galaxy A51 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy A51 is lighter and a little bit thinner. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy A51 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a camera with a 48 megapixels, the same (4K) video quality and a same size back-facing camera sensor. The Galaxy A51 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A51's battery performance is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.