Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a global score of 90.8 against 75.6. Galaxy A51 5G's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it's just a little bit lighter. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light situations, they both have the same video quality, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same video frame rates and a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.