Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's overall score of 75.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52 5G features a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's display, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.