Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 global score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design is newer, just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A52s shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.