Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a 76.9 score against 75.6. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Samsung Galaxy A70 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only 5 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit thinner and a little lighter.
Galaxy A70 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy A70 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.