Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 75.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although they were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy A71 features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.