Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a 92.9 score against 75.6. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is newer, a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a display that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way more megapixels camera and a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.