Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. Galaxy F41 is a newer and just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it is also just a bit thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.